Saturday, 3 May 2014

Merkel, Obama warn Russia amid violence in Ukraine

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has met with US President Barack Obama. The two leaders are seeking to repair ties after the NSA scandal and forge a common front in the Ukraine crisis.
Angela Merkel und Barack Obama 2.5.2014
President Obama and Chancellor Merkel held talks in Washington on Friday, amid escalating violence in eastern Ukraine.
In a joint press conference, the two leaders made clear that they were stepping up preparations to impose sanctions against sectors of the Russian economy, if Moscow did not work to de-escalate tensions in eastern Ukraine before the country's presidential elections on May 25th.
President Obama told reporters that the West was unlikely to end its business dealings with Moscow in the energy sector, but said that other areas of the Russian economy were vulnerable to EU-US sanctions.
"The idea that you're going to turn off the tap on all Russian oil and gas exports, I think is unrealistic," the president said. "But there are a range of approaches that can be taken not only in the energy sector, but in the arms sector, the finance sector, and lines of credit for trade, all of which have significant impact on Russia."
Chancellor Merkel warned that the crisis in Ukraine has challenged Europe's post-war order, which rests on the principle of the territorial integrity of all nations. Merkel said that although both the EU and US preferred a diplomatic solution, Moscow's behavior would determine whether or not economic sanctions were imposed.
"It's very much up to the Russians which road we will embark on," Merkel said.
Cyber dialogue instead of no-spy agreement
President Obama and Chancellor Merkel also touched on the issue of US intelligence agencies' controversial surveillance programs. Last year, the newsmagazine Der Spiegel revealed that the National Security Agency (NSA) had tapped Merkel's cell phone, sparking nationwide outrage in Germany.
The chancellor said that although US-German intelligence cooperation remained important, there were still key differences between the two allies on the proper balance between national security and personal privacy. Merkel said that the US and Germany would engage in a "cyber dialogue" in an effort to close the gap between the two countries' differing views on the issue.
"The situation is such that we have difficulties yet to overcome," Merkel said. "This is why there will have to be more than just business as usual."
Originally, Germany had pushed for a legally binding no-spy agreement with the US, in which the two allies would have agreed to refrain from snooping on each other. But Washington has opposed such an agreement.
"We do not have a blanket no-spy agreement with any country, with any of our closest partners," President Obama said. "What we do have is a series of partnerships...that are built up between various intelligence agencies."
"The basic approach we take with Germany is similar to the approach we take with all our allies and all our friends," he added.
Obama: No snooping on ordinary Germans
The US president claimed that German citizens were not subject to continuous surveillance or bulk data collection by the NSA. Obama said that he had ordered Washington's intelligence agencies to take into account the privacy of non-US persons.
He added that the US was committed to a cyber dialogue with Germany in order to clarify the two countries' goals and intentions.
"We're not perfectly aligned yet, but we share the same values and we share the same concerns," Obama said.
slk/kms (AP, AFP, Reuters)

Obama Says Not Meeting Anwar Ibrahim Is No Snub to Human Rights in Malaysia



President Obama sent his national security advisor to meet Malaysia's opposition leader. Mr. Anwar shares his message to the president with the WSJ's Deborah Kan.
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia—U.S. President Barack Obama pledged Sunday to encourage Malaysia to make progress on human-rights issues, saying that his decision not to meet with the chief opposition leader in this Southeast Asian country didn't indicate a lack of concern.
U.S. President Barack Obama with Malaysia's National Mosque Grand Imam Sheikh Ismail Muhammad and an embassy official Sunday in Kuala Lumpur. European Pressphoto Agency

The administration didn't offer a reason for declining a meeting with Mr. Anwar but said the president's schedule in Malaysia was packed.
The president held talks with Prime Minister Najib Razak during a two-night stay aimed at deepening relations with Malaysia, but he will be leaving a meeting with opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim to his national security adviser, Susan Rice.
"The fact that I haven't met with Mr. Anwar in and of itself isn't indicative of our lack of concern, given the fact that there are a lot of people I don't meet with and opposition leaders that I don't meet with," Mr. Obama said at a joint news conference with Mr. Najib. "And that doesn't mean that I'm not concerned about them."
Mr. Anwar is appealing a conviction for violating Malaysia's laws against sodomy in a case that he has said is politically motivated to constrain his growing influence. He led an alliance last year that gave the governing coalition its strongest election challenge since the country gained independence in 1957.
As the president's visit to Malaysia approached, Mr. Obama faced calls from Human Rights Watch and others to publicly criticize restrictions on free speech and religious freedom. Economic and social reforms have slowed as Mr. Najib has tried to shore up his political base among the country's ethnic Malay Muslim majority.
Mr. Obama said that human rights were on the agenda during his meetings Sunday with Malaysian officials and that he made U.S. values clear.
"The prime minister is the first to acknowledge that Malaysia has still got some work to do—just like the U.S., by the way, has some work to do on these issues," Mr. Obama said.
Mr. Najib, speaking at the same news conference, defended the government's track record on civil liberties. He said that it had repealed a law that allowed detention without trial and eased rules on public assembly, an overhaul that he said shouldn't be underestimated or diminished.
Mr. Najib said that the case against Mr. Anwar was a legal matter and that the government wasn't interfering.
Later Sunday, at a town hall event at the University of Malaya, Mr. Obama said that if Malaysia is going to continue to advance, the economy must afford everybody the opportunity to succeed.
Malaysia has decades-old affirmative action law in place that have benefited the majority Malay Muslims, who were economically disadvantaged. But many among the ethnic Chinese and Indian minorities complain of discrimination and the country is suffering from a so-called "brain drain," and many younger Malaysians increasingly complain about corruption and a lack of opportunity.
"It is hard to change old ways of doing things, and that is true for every country," the president said.

The president expressed his deepest condolences to the families who had lost loved ones on the Malaysian airliner, saying that the U.S. would continue to work closely with its partners to provide any needed assistance. He said that he and Mr. Najib discussed lessons learned from this tragedy and how nations might improve cooperation in the future.
Mr. Obama has said that his visit to Kuala Lumpur is a chance to continue to transform the U.S. relationship with Malaysia, which has been reeling from the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines 3786.KU 0.00% Flight 370 nearly two months ago. Mr. Obama's trip aimed to focus on trade, defense and maritime security.
"I can't speak for all the countries in the region but I can say that the U.S. and other partners have found the Malaysian government eager for assistance and fully forthcoming with us in terms of the information that they have," Mr. Obama said.
Mr. Najib said Malaysia and the U.S. have widened their relations to a "comprehensive partnership'' that will lead to greater collaboration on the economy, security, education, science and technology. They aim to enhance security in Southeast Asia, where China has been increasingly asserting claims to the South China Sea, and to untangle issues holding back a trans-Pacific trade deal that could be a major boost for global commerce.
After a red-carpet arrival Saturday, the president was feted at a 600-guest state dinner, where he spoke of a new era of collaboration—"bekerjasama" in the local Malay language. Early Sunday, he visited the National Mosque of Malaysia including the Warrior Mausoleum, where two former prime ministers and two former deputy prime ministers are buried.
Mr. Obama told the Malaysian newspaper The Star in an interview that the visit "reflects the renewed leadership role that the U.S. is playing in the Asia Pacific" and that "expanding our ties with the nations and peoples of Southeast Asia a centerpiece of that strategy."
Mr. Najib has said that the visit could cast his country in a fresh light and that Malaysia is poised to play a bigger role in the region and on the world stage.
Mr. Obama is the first U.S. president to visit Malaysia since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1966. Mr. Obama had planned to travel here last autumn, but he canceled the trip in the midst of the partial government shutdown in Washington.

Najib and Obama in historic bilateral meeting


Najib and Obama in historic bilateral meeting


WASHINGTON: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and US President Barack Obama met in a historic bilateral meeting here, paving the way for a new era in Malaysian-American ties.
The two leaders looked relaxed as they settled down to their first ever bilateral meeting at 11.30am yesterday (Malaysian time 11.30pm) at the Walter E. Washington Convention Centre where Obama is hosting the inaugural two-day Nuclear Security Summit.
Najib and Obama talked for 40 minutes, longer than their scheduled half-hour meeting, flanked by Acting Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim, who is Information Communi-cation and Culture Minister, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
They spoke about trade between their countries, security in the Asian region and Malaysia’s role in the Islamic world.
Najib and Obama: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak meeting US President Barack Obama at the Walter E. Washington Convention Centre ahead of the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, sending clear signals of a fresh spring in relations between Malaysia and the United States. The two leaders spoke for 40 minutes. Najib and Chinese President Hu Jintao are the only leaders from Asia to meet Obama on the sidelines of the summit. — Reuter
Also in the Prime Minister’s delegation for the meeting were Foreign Ministry secretary-general Tan Sri Rastam Mohd Isa and Malaysian ambassador to the United States Datuk Seri Jamaludin Jarjis.
Najib is among more than 40 world leaders attending the summit but only one of two Asian leaders granted a face-to-face meeting with Obama. The other leader is Chinese President Hu Jintao.
It was a hectic day for the prime minister who began his day with an early morning meeting at the Four Seasons Hotel with US Deputy Secretary of State James Steinburg and chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee Howard Berman who paid a courtesy call on him.
Vice President Joe Biden Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak to the Naval Observatory in Washington, Monday, April 12, for a luncheon meeting in conjunction with the Nuclear Security Summit. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
The Prime Minister then headed to the convention centre for his meeting with Obama and later was hosted to lunch by US vice-president Joe Biden at the Naval Observatory.
He is slated to hold a bilateral meeting with his New Zealand counterpart John Key at the convention centre in the afternoon before attending a welcoming reception by Obama for all invited heads of government.
In the evening, Najib will attend a Heads of Delegation working dinner chaired by Obama where the discussion topic is “Threat of Nuclear Terrorism”.
Vice President Joe Biden standing, delivers remarks during a luncheon in conjunction with the Nuclear Security Summit, Monday, April 12, at the Naval Observatory in Washington, Seated, from left are, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak; Nigeria's acting President Goodluck Jonathan; Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung; Thai Deputy Prime Minister Trirong Suwankiri; and White House's Non-Proliferation NSC Director Gary Samore. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
At the summit, Najib is expected to stress on Malaysia’s stance that any nuclear programme should be used only for development and peace.

GST rumors or goods ?


How does GST affect Malaysians?

GSTIn recent times, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) has been the subject of heated debates by Malaysians from all walks of life. While the experts and supporters lauded the positive wealth effect GST is expected to have on the country, others questioned the potential impacts GST could have on the common folks.
One thing is clear, GST is bound for implementation in Malaysia and its arrival could be in the very near future.
What are the pros and cons of GST on common Malaysians? Will we be better or worse off with this implementation? It pays to begin familiarising ourselves with the basics of GST and to understand some of the potential impacts GST may have on the consumers.
First off, what exactly is GST?
Officially, GST is a consumption tax that is imposed on goods and services at every stage of the supply chain, which typically begins at the manufacturing stage and ends at the retail stage. GST is based on the “valued-added” concept to avoid duplication in tax collected.
Here is an example of how GST with a rate of 10% can be imposed on a can of juice:
1) We start off with a juice manufacturer, who buys the required raw material from a supplier, say at RM1, to produce a can of juice. Under the GST system, the manufacturer ends up paying RM1.10 to the supplier (RM1 + 10% in GST). The supplier then pays the GST of RM0.10 it has collected to the government.
2) The manufacturer, upon producing the juice, charges the retailer RM2 for each can of juice. Under the GST system, the retailer ends up paying RM2.20 to the manufacturer (RM2 + 10% in GST). GST payment by the manufacturer to the government is RM0.10, after deducting the RM0.10 in GST it had paid earlier to the supplier.
3) The retailer, upon receiving the manufactured juice, now sells it to the consumer at RM3. Under the GST system, the consumer ends up paying RM3.30 to the retailer (RM3 + 10% in GST). GST payment by the retailer to the government is RM0.10, after deducting the RM0.20 in GST it had paid earlier to the manufacturer.
Eventually, after the numerous stages of GST collections and payments by different stakeholders, the government ends up receiving a total GST of 10% for the can of juice. The above example illustrates how the GST is ultimately borne by the consumer.
Replacing Sales Tax and Service Tax (SST)
In Malaysia, one of the common misconceptions about the GST is that it is a “new tax” that will make you pay more for everything you buy. However, according to the Authorities, GST is not a new tax but a replacement tax for Malaysia’s existing Sales Tax and Service Tax (SST).
Naturally, to understand how GST could change the consumption tax environment in Malaysia, one would first have to understand how SST works.
At present, there are two key components of SST. The first component is the Sales Tax, which is imposed on most goods at the import or manufacturing stages. Sales Tax is generally 10%, though it can be higher or lower depending on the nature of the goods.
In Malaysia, many consumers are unaware of the Sales Tax because it isn’t shown on the price tags or receipts of the goods we buy, instead, it is embedded within the pricing and passed on to the consumers.
The second component of SST is the Service Tax, which is imposed on a long list of taxable services that range from hotels, restaurants to legal and insurance companies. Service Tax is 6%, and is indicated in receipts when it is imposed.
As one could imagine, due to the way SST works, we as consumers often find ourselves unwittingly paying “double taxes” – first at the manufacturing stage, and later at the service stage.
The GST, which is set to replace the SST, is a far more comprehensive and transparent tax system that will ultimately benefit the consumers. One of its greatest benefits is the elimination of the possibility of paying “double taxes”, because the two-pronged tax rates and policies in the SST system would have been replaced by one single GST.
Using the earlier juice analogy, you’ll know you’re paying RM0.30 in GST for every RM3 can of juice you buy, and nothing else.
Ultimately, it is important to take note that GST is here to replace an older, arguably less efficient consumption tax system in the SST. GST is not a new tax, nor is it an additional tax that is imposed on top of existing taxes. So, technically, you will not “pay more for everything you buy” – which is the common impression of GST right now.
But will GST impact the prices of goods?
GST may not make you “pay more for everything you buy”, but it still bears implications on the pricing of goods, some more so than others. Using the widely speculated GST of 4% as assumption, these are some potential scenarios you could face as a consumer should GST be implemented:
Scenario A: You could end up paying 4% more for a product/service that previously wasn’t taxable under the SST. As GST is believed to cover a wider range of products/services than SST, this may apply to quite a number of items.
Scenario B: You could end up paying slightly less for a product/service that previously was taxable under the 6% Service Tax but not under the Sales Tax, or one that was taxable under the Sales Tax but not under the 6% Service Tax.
Scenario C: You could end up paying significantly less for a product/service that previously was taxable under the 6% Service Tax AND the Sales Tax.
Scenario D: You could be paying the same price for a product/service that is tax-exempted under both the GST and the SST.
In a nutshell, GST has the potential of causing prices to go up, go down or stay the same depending on the eventual rate as stated by the Government, as well as, tax policies for specific categories of goods and services. However, GST will not cause prices to go up in a universal manner.
How did our neighbour (Singapore) do it?
As with all policies that affect millions of lives, it makes sense to look at a real life example. In the case of GST, we can speculate a thing or two by looking at Singapore, which began implementing GST in 1994. These include:
GST Rate Adjustment: Since the introduction of GST, Singapore had revised its GST rate from 3%, to 4%, to 5% and subsequently to the present 7%. We can probably expect the same thing to happen to Malaysia over a period.
Offset Package: To counter financial burdens which may be caused by the introduction and rate increases of GST, Singapore introduced Offset Packages encompassing cash payouts, CPF top-ups and rebates for its people. In Malaysia, we already have BR1M, so the mechanism is in place for the Government to implement similar initiatives should it choose to.
Income Tax Alteration: Since the introduction of GST, Singapore had gradually lowered its top marginal rates for both corporate tax and personal income tax over the years. This could spell good news for tax payers in Malaysia, if we follow the same route.
At this point of time, nothing about GST in Malaysia has been confirmed, other than the fact that the government seems adamant in implementing it in the near future. With next to no official information on the rates, policies and technicalities (such as exempted categories of goods), everything we know of GST remains speculation and nothing else.
For Malaysian consumers who may be feeling on edge from all the arguments surrounding GST, there is every chance that you will experience an initial shock or even a feeling of apprehension when you find an additional line of tax in your bills the moment GST is implemented – which is widely speculated to be 2015.

Ukraine: Putin signs Crimea annexation


Ukraine: Putin signs Crimea annexation


Gavin Hewitt reports: ''The president saluted what he called a serious, momentous event''
President Vladimir Putin has signed a law formalising Russia's takeover of Crimea from Ukraine, despite fresh sanctions from the EU and the US.
The European Union's latest measures target 12 people involved in Russia's annexation of the peninsula.
Earlier, Ukraine and the EU signed an accord forging closer political ties.
Separately, the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe has agreed to send monitors to Ukraine, after Russia dropped objections.
The six-month mission will initially consist of 100 international civilian monitors, who will be employed in nine regions of Ukraine - including the south-eastern areas rocked by violence between pro-Ukraine and pro-Russian activists.

Jose Manuel Barroso: ''Nobody has recognised the annexation of Crimea''
The observers will not go to Crimea but German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said the decision was "a step that helps to support our de-escalation efforts".
Western diplomats had blamed Russia for several failed attempt to agree such a mission to help defuse the tense situation.
In Brussels, EU leaders also said they would step up efforts to reduce energy dependency on Russia.
The EU's new sanctions add to an existing list of 21 officials affected by travel bans and asset freezes.
They include Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin and two close aides of Vladimir Putin, Sergei Glazyev and Vladislav Surkov.
Vladimir Putin (C) signs a law on ratification of a treaty making Crimea part of Russia, during a ceremony in the Kremlin, with Valentina Matviyenko (L), the speaker of the upper house of Russian parliament, and Sergei Naryshkin (R), the speaker of parliaments lower house (21 Marc 2014)Vladimir Putin was flanked by the two parliamentary speakers as he signed the law annexing Crimea
The speakers of Russia's two houses of parliament, Valentina Matviyenko and Sergei Naryshkin - both at Mr Putin's side as he signed the Crimea law - are also included.

Crisis timeline

  • 21 Nov 2013: President Viktor Yanukovych abandons an EU deal
  • Dec: Pro-EU protesters occupy Kiev city hall and Independence Square
  • 20-21 Feb 2014: At least 88 people killed in Kiev clashes
  • 22 Feb: Mr Yanukovych flees; parliament removes him and calls election
  • 27-28 Feb: Pro-Russian gunmen seize key buildings in Crimea. Parliament, under siege, appoints pro-Moscow Sergei Aksyonov a PM
  • 6 Mar: Crimea's parliament votes to join Russia
  • 16 Mar: Crimea voters choose to secede in disputed referendum
  • 17 Mar: Crimean parliament declares independence and formally applies to join Russia
  • 18 Mar: Russian and Crimean leaders sign deal in Moscow to join the region to Russia
While the list targets several figures close to the Russian president, it does not hit his inner circle as hard as the sanctions announced by the US on Thursday.
Downgrade
Shares fell sharply in Moscow on Friday as investors assessed the impact of Western sanctions on Russia's economy.
Two credit-rating agencies have now downgraded Russia's outlook from stable to negative.
Visa and Mastercard have also stopped providing services to two Russian financial institutions, Bank Rossiya (hit by US sanctions) and SMP Bank.
The accord signed by the EU and Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk in Brussels on Friday contains the political part of the EU Association Agreement rejected in November by Viktor Yanukovych, who was then Ukraine's president.
That decision triggered violent protests, Mr Yanukovych's eventual overthrow and Russia's subsequent move into Crimea.
Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, right, speaks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel after a signing ceremony at an EU summit in Brussels on Friday, March 21, 2014Ukraine's PM Arseniy Yatsenyuk met EU leaders including Angela Merkel at the Brussels summit
The United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, visiting Kiev the day after meeting Mr Putin in Moscow, urged Ukraine and Russia to hold talks to prevent the crisis spreading.
Ukraine's interim President Olexander Turchynov, after meeting Mr Ban, said Ukraine would never accept "the seizure of its territory".
In a separate development on Friday, Ukrainian police detained the head of the Naftogaz state energy firm, Yevhen Bakulin.
He is accused of embezzling $4bn (£2.4bn) during Mr Yanukovych's time in power.
Officials investigating corruption at Ukraine's agriculture ministry are reported to have seized tens of thousands of dollars in cash.
Russian troops enter a military base in Perevalnoye, near the Crimean city of Simferopol, March 21, 2014.Russian troops enter a Ukrainian military base near the Crimean city of Simferopol
A young boy waves a Russian flag as people look at fireworks in the Crimean city of Simferopol (21 March 2014) A child in the Crimean city of Simferopol takes part in the celebrations
In Crimea itself, forces allied to Russia have been seizing Ukrainian ships and taking over military bases.
The new authorities in Crimea have invited those serving in the Ukrainian forces on the peninsula to switch sides and join the Russian military.
Fireworks
Mr Putin ordered fireworks displays for Moscow and Crimea on Friday night to celebrate the region becoming part of the Russian Federation.
Russia has put in place travel bans and asset freezes for nine prominent US officials and lawmakers in response to Thursday's announcement of sanctions targeting Mr Putin's allies by President Barack Obama.
Senator John McCain, one of those targeted, joked in a tweet that he would have to cancel his spring break in Siberia.
Mr Putin said Moscow would not retaliate for the latest EU sanctions - although the Russian foreign ministry said there would be a response.
Map of Crimea

How to Manage Stress


Identify the sources of stress in your life

Stress management starts with identifying the sources of stress in your life. This isn’t as easy as it sounds. Your true sources of stress aren’t always obvious, and it’s all too easy to overlook your own stress-inducing thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Sure, you may know that you’re constantly worried about work deadlines. But maybe it’s your procrastination, rather than the actual job demands, that leads to deadline stress.
To identify your true sources of stress, look closely at your habits, attitude, and excuses:
  • Do you explain away stress as temporary (“I just have a million things going on right now”) even though you can’t remember the last time you took a breather?
  • Do you define stress as an integral part of your work or home life (“Things are always crazy around here”) or as a part of your personality (“I have a lot of nervous energy, that’s all”).
  • Do you blame your stress on other people or outside events, or view it as entirely normal and unexceptional?
Until you accept responsibility for the role you play in creating or maintaining it, your stress level will remain outside your control.

Start a Stress Journal

A stress journal can help you identify the regular stressors in your life and the way you deal with them. Each time you feel stressed, keep track of it in your journal. As you keep a daily log, you will begin to see patterns and common themes. Write down:
  • What caused your stress (make a guess if you’re unsure)
  • How you felt, both physically and emotionally
  • How you acted in response
  • What you did to make yourself feel better

Look at how you currently cope with stress

Think about the ways you currently manage and cope with stress in your life. Your stress journal can help you identify them. Are your coping strategies healthy or unhealthy, helpful or unproductive? Unfortunately, many people cope with stress in ways that compound the problem.

Unhealthy ways of coping with stress

These coping strategies may temporarily reduce stress, but they cause more damage in the long run:
  • Using pills or drugs to relax
  • Sleeping too much
  • Procrastinating
  • Filling up every minute of the day to avoid facing problems
  • Taking out your stress on others (lashing out, angry outbursts, physical violence)

Learning healthier ways to manage stress

If your methods of coping with stress aren’t contributing to your greater emotional and physical health, it’s time to find healthier ones. There are many healthy ways to manage and cope with stress, but they all require change. You can either change the situation or change your reaction. When deciding which option to choose, it’s helpful to think of the four As: avoid, alter, adapt, or accept.
Since everyone has a unique response to stress, there is no “one size fits all” solution to managing it. No single method works for everyone or in every situation, so experiment with different techniques and strategies. Focus on what makes you feel calm and in control.

Dealing with Stressful Situations: The Four A’s

Change the situation:
  • Avoid the stressor
  • Alter the stressor
Change your reaction:
  • Adapt to the stressor
  • Accept the stressor

Stress management strategy #1: Avoid unnecessary stress

Not all stress can be avoided, and it’s not healthy to avoid a situation that needs to be addressed. You may be surprised, however, by the number of stressors in your life that you can eliminate.
  • Learn how to say “no” – Know your limits and stick to them. Whether in your personal or professional life, taking on more than you can handle is a surefire recipe for stress.
  • Avoid people who stress you out – If someone consistently causes stress in your life and you can’t turn the relationship around, limit the amount of time you spend with that person or end the relationship entirely.
  • Take control of your environment – If the evening news makes you anxious, turn the TV off. If traffic’s got you tense, take a longer but less-traveled route. If going to the market is an unpleasant chore, do your grocery shopping online.
  • Avoid hot-button topics – If you get upset over religion or politics, cross them off your conversation list. If you repeatedly argue about the same subject with the same people, stop bringing it up or excuse yourself when it’s the topic of discussion.
  • Pare down your to-do list – Analyze your schedule, responsibilities, and daily tasks. If you’ve got too much on your plate, distinguish between the “shoulds” and the “musts.” Drop tasks that aren’t truly necessary to the bottom of the list or eliminate them entirely.

Stress management strategy #2: Alter the situation

If you can’t avoid a stressful situation, try to alter it. Figure out what you can do to change things so the problem doesn’t present itself in the future. Often, this involves changing the way you communicate and operate in your daily life.
  • Express your feelings instead of bottling them up. If something or someone is bothering you, communicate your concerns in an open and respectful way. If you don’t voice your feelings, resentment will build and the situation will likely remain the same.
  • Be willing to compromise. When you ask someone to change their behavior, be willing to do the same. If you both are willing to bend at least a little, you’ll have a good chance of finding a happy middle ground.
  • Be more assertive. Don’t take a backseat in your own life. Deal with problems head on, doing your best to anticipate and prevent them. If you’ve got an exam to study for and your chatty roommate just got home, say up front that you only have five minutes to talk.
  • Manage your time better. Poor time management can cause a lot of stress. When you’re stretched too thin and running behind, it’s hard to stay calm and focused. But if you plan ahead and make sure you don’t overextend yourself, you can alter the amount of stress you’re under.

Stress management strategy #3: Adapt to the stressor

If you can’t change the stressor, change yourself. You can adapt to stressful situations and regain your sense of control by changing your expectations and attitude.
  • Reframe problems. Try to view stressful situations from a more positive perspective. Rather than fuming about a traffic jam, look at it as an opportunity to pause and regroup, listen to your favorite radio station, or enjoy some alone time.
  • Look at the big picture. Take perspective of the stressful situation. Ask yourself how important it will be in the long run. Will it matter in a month? A year? Is it really worth getting upset over? If the answer is no, focus your time and energy elsewhere.
  • Adjust your standards. Perfectionism is a major source of avoidable stress. Stop setting yourself up for failure by demanding perfection. Set reasonable standards for yourself and others, and learn to be okay with “good enough.”
  • Focus on the positive. When stress is getting you down, take a moment to reflect on all the things you appreciate in your life, including your own positive qualities and gifts. This simple strategy can help you keep things in perspective.

Meeting of Russian and Ukrainian foreign ministers


Meeting of Russian and Ukrainian foreign ministers

The Guardian's Julian Borger has been sketching out the scene today in the Hague, where he says that the Dutch hosts have sought to move away from their tendency at previous summits of playing up the supposedly quirky, unconventional nature of their country.
He also writes that Ukraine's foreign minister, Andrii Deshchytsia, had told journalists that he looked forward to meeting his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, for the first time to talk peace and maybe even have a vodka together. Julian adds:
Within half an hour, half his wish was granted. A picture was issued by the Russian foreign minister showing the two men staring grimly across a bare white table, with small flags, white flowers and mineral water between them. No vodka and, going by the body language, no closer to peace, either.

Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, right, meets with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Deshchytsia at the Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) in The Hague.
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, right, meets with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Deshchytsia at the Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) in The Hague. Photograph: AP
Updated 

Ukraine hopes for UN resolution

Ukraine is hoping the UN General Assembly will adopt a resolution later this week reaffirming the country's unity and territorial integrity and underscoring that the referendum that led to Crimea's annexation by Russia "has no validity."
The draft resolution, circulated Monday to the 193 assembly members and obtained by the Associated Press (AP), never mentions Russia by name but calls on all countries not to recognize "any alteration of the status" of Crimea.
AP reports:
[The draft resolution] also urges all parties to pursue a peaceful resolution of the situation in Ukraine, "refrain from unilateral actions and inflammatory rhetoric that may increase tensions, and to engage fully with international mediation efforts."
The General Assembly's resolutions are not legally binding but they reflect world opinion, and Ukraine will be looking for a strong "yes" vote to show Russia's international isolation.
The U.N.'s most powerful body, the Security Council, has been blocked from taking any action because Russia, has veto power as one of its five permanent members. Even so, the 15-member council has held eight meetings on Ukraine, as Western powers strive to keep up the pressure on Moscow.
The Guardian's Richard Norton Taylor has written a critique of the call by General (now Lord) Richard Dannatt, former head of the British army, for western diplomacy to be backed up by greater military capability.
Richard writes that British generals, past and present, are deeply unhappy about the government's decision to cut the regular army by 20%, from 102,000 to 82,000 by 2020.
He suggests, however: 
A threat of deploying British soldiers against Russian forces (500 are being sent on a Nato exercise in the Baltic) may be a slightly more realistic deterrent than a Trident long-range nuclear ballistic missile, but it will not help to prevent more violent ethnic disputes along the national state borders of central and eastern Europe. Far from it.
You can read the piece in full here.
As always, the diplomacy is likely to continue over dinner. Willem-Alexander, is hosting 53 world leaders who have been taking part in the Nuclear Security Summit.
Despite the G7's serious criticism of Russia, and their threat of imposing damaging economic sanctions, opportunities for communication remain open. Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, is among those attending.

King Willem Alexander (far-left) delivers a speech during a dinner for the members of the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit, at the Royal Palace Huis ten Bosch in The Hague.
King Willem Alexander (far-left) delivers a speech during a dinner for the members of the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit, at the Royal Palace Huis ten Bosch in The Hague. Photograph: FRANK VAN BEEK/POOL/EPA
Updated 
Commentators have digesting the (by now widely circulated) G7 declaration and its potential consequences.
Mark Knoller, White House Correspondent at CBS News, sums up what he believes to be its grim significance:

The G-7 Declaration offers the feel that the Cold War is back.
— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) March 24, 2014

Matt Lee, diplomatic writer at the Associated Press, suggests that Britain's foreign secretary, William Hague, won't be displeased about the statement, which is called after the Dutch city where G7 leaders had been meeting. He also recalls a 1994 political agreement seeking to provide assurances relating to Ukraine's accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

The Hague Declaration! British foreign secretary secretly chuffed. But will this more or less respected than The Budapest Memorandum?
— Matt Lee (@APDiploWriter) March 24, 2014
Updated 
The British foreign Secretary, William Hague, has described the cancellation of the G8 meeting this year as "a huge blow" and suggested that it would be hard to revive the relationship with Russia.
He said:
It would need our values to be clear, our shared values to be clear again, and clearly those shared values are not shared by Russia in violating the independence and territorial integrity of a neighbouring nation state.
This is the G7 this year and we will see how long it takes to change that in the future.
Hague also highlighted the focus on energy issues as potentially "changing the balance of leverage between Russia and the European Union" and acknowledged that tougher sanctions would mean "many countries bear the cost of that in many ways" but "we have to be prepared to do that". He added:
Every country would have to do what is necessary if more far-reaching sanctions were applied, accepting that that would affect different economies in different ways.
The United Kingdom is certainly prepared to do that. There is nothing that other countries in Europe have proposed that we have blocked. The United Kingdom is fully prepared to play its full part.
The declaration's final point backs financial support to the faltering economy of Ukraine, saying:
The International Monetary Fund has a central role leading the international effort to support Ukrainian reform, lessening Ukraine’s economic vulnerabilities, and better integrating the country as a market economy in the multilateral system. 
We strongly support the IMF’s work with the Ukrainian authorities and urge them to reach a rapid conclusion. IMF support will be critical in unlocking additional assistance from the World Bank, other international financial institutions, the EU, and bilateral sources.
We remain united in our commitment to provide strong financial backing to Ukraine, to coordinate our technical assistance and to provide assistance in other areas, including measures to enhance trade and strengthen energy security.
Updated 
However, that point is followed by the G7's formal announcement that it issuspending participation in the G8 until..
.. Russia changes course and the environment comes back to where the G-8 is able to have a meaningful discussion and will meet again in G-7 format at the same time as planned, in June 2014, in Brussels, to discuss the broad agenda we have together. We have also advised our Foreign Ministers not to attend the April meeting in Moscow. 
In addition, we have decided that G-7 Energy Ministers will meet to discuss ways to strengthen our collective energy security.
Updated 
The G7's 'Hague Declaration' does make some attempt to reach out to Russia. In point five of the eight-point statement, it says that Russia's support for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine is "a step in the right direction."
It adds: 
We look forward to the mission’s early deployment, in order to facilitate the dialogue on the ground, reduce tensions and promote normalization of the situation, and we call on all parties to ensure that Special Monitoring Mission members have safe and secure access throughout Ukraine to fulfill their mandate.
A US official has told Reuters that Russian intervention into southern or eastern Ukraine would be the clearest trigger for additional sanctions, or violence in Crimea.

G7 issue "Hague Declaration"

A joint statement, which is being called "The Hague Declaration", has been released by G7 leaders (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the US.
It reaffirms G7 support for Ukraine's sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence and warns that Russia's actions will have "significant consequences".
It adds of Russia's actions:
This clear violation of international law is a serious challenge to the rule of law around the world and should be a concern for all nations. In response to Russia’s violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to demonstrate our determination to respond to these illegal actions, individually and collectively we have imposed a variety of sanctions against Russia and those individuals and entities responsible. We remain ready to intensify actions including coordinated sectoral sanctions that will have an increasingly significant impact on the Russian economy, if Russia continues to escalate this situation.
You can read the full text here at the European Commission's website. Here's a pic of the statement (via a tweet from Time political reporter Zeke Miller) as it looks:

BREAKING: The G7 statement, titled "THE HAGUE DECLARATION" pic.twitter.com/ROB8qNDQKc
— Zeke Miller (@ZekeJMiller) March 24, 2014
Updated 
Diplomatic sources speaking on behalf of G7 leaders have been providing further briefings, telling Reuters that G7 leaders "remain ready to intensify action against Russia, including taking "coordinated sanctions".

Russia shrugs off G7 threats

Russia's foreign minister has been shrugging off the threat of exclusion from meetings of the world's largest industrial countries and the suspension of the G8, saying that Moscow was "not clinging to" membership of what he described as an informal group.
Sergei Lavrov was speaking minutes after his first meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart, Andrii Deshchytsia, at the margins of the global nuclear security summit in The Hague, from where my colleague Julian Borger has sent this report.
Lavrov said that he would maintain contacts with the authorities in Kiev, but gave no sign of any breakthrough in the impasse over the future of Crimea.
He drew a comparison between Crimea and Kosovo and asked whether the west wanted "blood to [be] shed" in the same way.
Western diplomats said they expected a joint statement leaders from the G7 industrialised countries, dissolving the G8 group, which has provided a forum for contacts between the western industrialised world and Russia since 1998.
However, Lavrov presented the threat as insignificant, saying:
The G8 is an informal club, with no formal membership, so no one can be expelled from it....Its raison d'etre was for deliberations between western industrialised countries and Russia, but there are other fora for that now … so if our western partners say there is no future for that format, then so be it. We are not clinging to that format.
This is Ben Quinn taking over the blog now.
Updated 

Summary

Here's a roundup of the latest developments around Ukraine, Crimea and Russia:
• Ukraine has withdrawn all its troops from Crimea, after Russia launched another attack on a military base there. Reports saidRussian troops used helicopters and stun grenades to take over theFeodosia naval base. The Ukrainian defence ministry said between 60 and 80 marines were captured by the Russians. Russia says its flag is now flying over 189 military institutions in Crimea.
• The G7 leaders, meeting in the Hague, have said this year's G8 meeting – to be held in Sochi in June – is cancelled, in the wake of what the White House called Russia's "flagrant" violation of international law. The G7 leaders are meeting to discuss the possible permanent expulsion of Russia from the Group of Eight.
• Russia has banned 13 Canadians from entering its territory, in a retaliatory move following Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper's visit to Kiev at the weekend. One, Liberal MP Chrystia Freelandsaid "it's an honour to be on Putin's sanction list".
• Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov has met US secretary of stateJohn Kerry in the Hague, on the fringes of the Nuclear Security Summit attended by world leaders.

Sergey #Lavrov and John Kerry's meeting in Hague@RusEmbUSA pic.twitter.com/4OphBGKZek
— MFA Russia (@mfa_russia) March 24, 2014

Russian FM Sergey Lavrov left @NSS2014 in the Hague during the speech by UA's FM @AndriiDesh Not good prognostic for dialogue & deescalation
— Marcin Wojciechowski (@maw75) March 24, 2014

Karzai backs Russian annexation of Crimea

The Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, has backed Russia's annexation of Crimea, saying a much-criticised referendum on its future reflected its people's "free will" to decide their future, reports Emma Graham-Harrison:
It was an unexpected move from a man who has little stake in Ukraine's future, spent years fighting to evict Soviet forces from his own country, and now leads a democracy funded largely by the western nations that have slapped sanctions on Moscow.
However, Karzai has always been keen to counter accusations that he is a foreign puppet, and more recently has been at odds with the United States over everything from air strikes and the forthcoming presidential election to the recent release of dozens of prisoners captured by foreign troops.
He may also be looking to strengthen regional ties, at a time when western interest in Afghanistan is fading and with it the funds the government needs to pay the army and keep the country running.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has said that
Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has said that "Afghanistan respects the free will of the people of Crimea to decide about their own future". Photograph: S. Sabawoon/EPA
Updated 
Russian defence minister Sergei Shoigu has inspected military bases in Crimea today, the most senior Russian official to visit the region since it was annexed by Moscow, Reuters reports:
Shoigu, one of President Vladimir Putin's longest serving ministers and closest allies, was shown by Russian television station NTV meeting with Ukrainian officers who defected to the side of pro-Russian local authorities.
"The most important thing is that there not be any interim period when there is an absence of authority so that military hardware does not fall into the wrong hands," Shoigu told military commanders.

Russian defence minister Sergei Shoigu meets with Crimean officials at a military base in Sevastopol.
Russian defence minister Sergei Shoigu meets with Crimean officials at a military base in Sevastopol. Photograph: AP
One of the 13 Canadians on the sanctions list issued today by Russia isChrystia Freeland, Liberal MP for Toronto Central, who was previously a reporter working in Ukraine the Financial Times, Washington Post, and The Economist; and the FT's Moscow bureau chief. She has now been banned from entering Russia.

Love Russ lang/culture, loved my yrs in Moscow; but it's an honour to be on Putin's sanction list, esp in company of friends Cotler & Grod
— Chrystia Freeland (@cafreeland) March 24, 2014

Grod is Paul Grod, president of the Ukrainian Canadian Congress.
Cotler is Irwin Cotler, another Liberal MP.
Updated 
More on the cancellation of this summer's G8 meeting in Sochi, as the G7 leaders meet in the Hague to discuss the possible expulsion of Russia from the Group of Eight.
The White House has said that, as long as Russia continues "flagrantly" to violate international law, "there is no need for it to engage with the G7".

British Prime Minister David Cameron at the opening session of the Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague.
British Prime Minister David Cameron at the opening session of the Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague. Photograph: Sean Gallup/Getty Images

We should be clear there's not going to be a G8 summit this year in Russia. That's absolutely clear.
Russia needs to change course. We need to send a very clear message to President Putin that it would be completely unacceptable to send more troops into Ukraine.